<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Targett Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miketargett.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miketargett.com</link>
	<description>Community Electronic Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toward Collaborative Local Politics by Leah Noble</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/blog/toward-collaborative-local-politics/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=1804#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Mike, thanks for doing this - meeting with the mayor, and writing about it. I&#039;d love to hear more about what your group and Mr Morgan decided to do, at the end of the meeting. Meet again in a month? What were the concrete &quot;deliverables&quot;, if any? It sounds like the start of something very positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, thanks for doing this &#8211; meeting with the mayor, and writing about it. I&#8217;d love to hear more about what your group and Mr Morgan decided to do, at the end of the meeting. Meet again in a month? What were the concrete &#8220;deliverables&#8221;, if any? It sounds like the start of something very positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toward Collaborative Local Politics by Meghan Farrell</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/blog/toward-collaborative-local-politics/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=1804#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Wonderful article! 

People have forgotten the strength of the Antigonish movement and the amazing power of co-operatives! 

Nova Scotia leads english speaking Canada in co-operative development and initiatives.

We have over 400 co-operatives and credit unions in NS. They employ over 7000 people, provide housing to over 6000 people and are worth over 5 billion dollars in assets! That&#039;s huge!

In more than 35 communities, credit union and co-ops are the only service providers, and co-operative have a MUCH higher rate of success then traditional business. 

I would love to see the co-op movement strongly embraced in Cape Breton, it&#039;s where it all began for Canada. 

Imagine the financial freedom, the independence, and power our communities could have!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful article! </p>
<p>People have forgotten the strength of the Antigonish movement and the amazing power of co-operatives! </p>
<p>Nova Scotia leads english speaking Canada in co-operative development and initiatives.</p>
<p>We have over 400 co-operatives and credit unions in NS. They employ over 7000 people, provide housing to over 6000 people and are worth over 5 billion dollars in assets! That&#8217;s huge!</p>
<p>In more than 35 communities, credit union and co-ops are the only service providers, and co-operative have a MUCH higher rate of success then traditional business. </p>
<p>I would love to see the co-op movement strongly embraced in Cape Breton, it&#8217;s where it all began for Canada. </p>
<p>Imagine the financial freedom, the independence, and power our communities could have!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protest Songs by Rod Gale</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/work/protest-songs/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=1388#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve put a link up to this on the facebook page that I made for members out of my hall- LIUNA Local 92 out of Edmonton who live here in Cape Breton. 

Their are a great many of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve put a link up to this on the facebook page that I made for members out of my hall- LIUNA Local 92 out of Edmonton who live here in Cape Breton. </p>
<p>Their are a great many of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Owns This Town? Responses to New Dawn&#8217;s Public Meeting by Sean Howard</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/blog/who-owns-this-town-responses-to-new-dawns-public-meeting/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=943#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[This letter originally appeared in The Cape Breton Post. Sean has allowed me to republish it here.]

I am writing to commend Neal Livingston for his concise denunciation of the Darrell Dexter government for its “phony propaganda campaign” on behalf of the Irving shipyard in Halifax (Province should be backing arts, not warships, July 25, 2011).

Livingston is right: instead of expensive, bureaucratic boosterism in defence of an outmoded and myopic big industry model of development, Nova Scotia needs to invest in the green, co-operative and creative entrepreneurship of the “new economy.”

And Livingston’s critique can be applied with equal force to the imminent $37-million dredging of Sydney harbour (subsidized almost entirely by federal, provincial and municipal taxpayers), the first stage of an envisaged reindustrialization of the city.

The second stage, predictably, is an exorbitant advertising campaign, enriching numerous consultants and cheerleading groups, painting the picture of a thriving, prosperous megaport, with the inevitably grim consequences of “success” (pollution, hazardous materials, urban sprawl, unaffordable housing, higher crime rates, intrusive security, etc.) carefully airbrushed away.

Precisely because of the devastating failure of capitalism in our region, and the deliberate governmental neglect of alternative, co-operative models, many people are desperate to believe in this one-dimensional vision. But with a naturally deepwater, privately-funded international terminal in Melford, plus significant unused capacity in Halifax, the realistic prospects are far dimmer than the ceaseless spin suggests.

It may be, in fact, that we never recoup the financial costs of dredging the harbour, while the costs to the marine environment, as local fishermen are right to fear, are likely to be severe. While there is considerable hidden unease about the project, open opposition is rare and generally greeted with scorn and hostility. But in all probability, what we are about to witness is an environmental crime, committed in pursuit of an economic illusion: a false, not a new, dawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[This letter originally appeared in The Cape Breton Post. Sean has allowed me to republish it here.]</p>
<p>I am writing to commend Neal Livingston for his concise denunciation of the Darrell Dexter government for its “phony propaganda campaign” on behalf of the Irving shipyard in Halifax (Province should be backing arts, not warships, July 25, 2011).</p>
<p>Livingston is right: instead of expensive, bureaucratic boosterism in defence of an outmoded and myopic big industry model of development, Nova Scotia needs to invest in the green, co-operative and creative entrepreneurship of the “new economy.”</p>
<p>And Livingston’s critique can be applied with equal force to the imminent $37-million dredging of Sydney harbour (subsidized almost entirely by federal, provincial and municipal taxpayers), the first stage of an envisaged reindustrialization of the city.</p>
<p>The second stage, predictably, is an exorbitant advertising campaign, enriching numerous consultants and cheerleading groups, painting the picture of a thriving, prosperous megaport, with the inevitably grim consequences of “success” (pollution, hazardous materials, urban sprawl, unaffordable housing, higher crime rates, intrusive security, etc.) carefully airbrushed away.</p>
<p>Precisely because of the devastating failure of capitalism in our region, and the deliberate governmental neglect of alternative, co-operative models, many people are desperate to believe in this one-dimensional vision. But with a naturally deepwater, privately-funded international terminal in Melford, plus significant unused capacity in Halifax, the realistic prospects are far dimmer than the ceaseless spin suggests.</p>
<p>It may be, in fact, that we never recoup the financial costs of dredging the harbour, while the costs to the marine environment, as local fishermen are right to fear, are likely to be severe. While there is considerable hidden unease about the project, open opposition is rare and generally greeted with scorn and hostility. But in all probability, what we are about to witness is an environmental crime, committed in pursuit of an economic illusion: a false, not a new, dawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mabou Gardens by Mike Targett</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/work/mabou-gardens/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Targett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=1272#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Glad you like, Suzanne, I&#039;m pretty happy with the way it turned out. I look forward to seeing some great photos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like, Suzanne, I&#8217;m pretty happy with the way it turned out. I look forward to seeing some great photos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mabou Gardens by Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/work/mabou-gardens/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=1272#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I love our new website...thanks Mike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love our new website&#8230;thanks Mike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Governors Pub &amp; Eatery by Mike Targett</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/work/governors-pub-eatery/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Targett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=974#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dan. And thanks for the tip, I&#039;ve fixed the entertainment page order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dan. And thanks for the tip, I&#8217;ve fixed the entertainment page order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Governors Pub &amp; Eatery by Dan Hooper</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/work/governors-pub-eatery/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=974#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Serious step up from the old site! Great work!

I just took a quick peek at the Entertainment section, and was briefly thrown off by the events being ordered by descending date. Was that deliberate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serious step up from the old site! Great work!</p>
<p>I just took a quick peek at the Entertainment section, and was briefly thrown off by the events being ordered by descending date. Was that deliberate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Owns This Town? Responses to New Dawn&#8217;s Public Meeting by Andrew Lionais</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/blog/who-owns-this-town-responses-to-new-dawns-public-meeting/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lionais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=943#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I am a 30 year old native of Cape Breton. I grew up in Bras d’Or, sailed during the summers in North Sydney harbour and now live half the year in Sydney. I feel connected to the region and look forward to prosperous times again. The proposed construction of a container port in Sydney Harbor has lifted the hopes of many in the area with its promises of good, long-term jobs and economic spin-off that will reach thousands on the island. I have worked in the marine industry for the last ten years on the west coast and the thought of landing a good job in Sydney is enticing, but still not enough to convince me that a container port would be a wise decision for the long-term sustainability of our town, island or planet. I fear that it will change our harbour for the worse. We will likely have to deal with a great deal of light and noise pollution, an increase in crime, and harbour waters that will get dirtier, rather than healthier. We will live with an increased threat of the introduction of invasive species and damaging oil spills. I am also skeptical of any corporate or government pledge to make good on the number of jobs it promises us. 

I believe that every man and woman in Cape Breton, and the world, should have the opportunity for well-paying, meaningful employment, but we should be focused on building a strong local economy founded on sustainability, with limits dictated by our fair share of available resources. We should put effort into supporting local business, securing our food and energy supply, and increasing the efficiency of our homes and businesses. These endeavours alone would provide many jobs on our island; possibly rivaling the forecasted numbers of the port.

We live in an economically depressed region, and to rally against the construction of the container port and the employment it will provide, without providing alternatives, would be wrong in my point of view. However, to not consider more sustainable alternatives, and put some time and effort into finding more sustainable solutions for our island’s future, could be a very expensive, highly-visible, long-lasting mistake. There are no guarantees with this venture, and it’s a lot of eggs to put in one basket. 

The construction of a new container port, and ports in general, signifies an increase in global trade. This is a step backwards in our fight to protect the environment and pass on a hospitable planet to future generations. We have been polluting our water and air, degrading our soil, and creating mountains of waste for much too long. If we were to take stock of our available resources and divide them equally between all people on this planet, we would find that we are living far beyond our means. Our unsustainable western consumer culture comes at the expense of other populations and the planet we live on. It is the driving force behind many violent atrocities and recent environmental catastrophes in the world. We have been bombarded with media for generations that tells us we need to have and to own more and more. We have been taught in schools and our communities for decades that whoever has the most wins. Both not true.

We actually need very little, and many of the happiest cultures around the world are testament to this. We need food, clothing, shelter, and community; all of which we can provide sustainably. We must learn to live with less. Resources are finite and we are already at the breaking point. As developing nations grow and increasingly transition toward western values, things will get worse. We run the risk of running out of food and water in our quest to obtain material wealth. Capitalism has its limits and we are approaching them fast.

If we have exhausted all alternatives to a container port and reached the end of the debate, I would urge the community to step up and get involved. No one but ourselves will look out for our interests. The planning, construction, and operation, if left to outside organizations, will be driven by profit margins alone; environmental and social concerns will be met with the minimum adherence required. Why would we allow the corporate elite to get richer at the expense of our beautiful harbour and incredible island community. Now is the chance to take ownership, write the rulebook, and become the watchdog. An island of planners are better than a handful, and with careful thought, transparency, and eagerness to rise above the status quo, we should be able to design, build and operate the most sustainable port in the world. We have the opportunity to set a new standard and become a global example of commitment to excellence. Let us not judge our success by quarterly profits, but by our unwavering integrity and strength of community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 30 year old native of Cape Breton. I grew up in Bras d’Or, sailed during the summers in North Sydney harbour and now live half the year in Sydney. I feel connected to the region and look forward to prosperous times again. The proposed construction of a container port in Sydney Harbor has lifted the hopes of many in the area with its promises of good, long-term jobs and economic spin-off that will reach thousands on the island. I have worked in the marine industry for the last ten years on the west coast and the thought of landing a good job in Sydney is enticing, but still not enough to convince me that a container port would be a wise decision for the long-term sustainability of our town, island or planet. I fear that it will change our harbour for the worse. We will likely have to deal with a great deal of light and noise pollution, an increase in crime, and harbour waters that will get dirtier, rather than healthier. We will live with an increased threat of the introduction of invasive species and damaging oil spills. I am also skeptical of any corporate or government pledge to make good on the number of jobs it promises us. </p>
<p>I believe that every man and woman in Cape Breton, and the world, should have the opportunity for well-paying, meaningful employment, but we should be focused on building a strong local economy founded on sustainability, with limits dictated by our fair share of available resources. We should put effort into supporting local business, securing our food and energy supply, and increasing the efficiency of our homes and businesses. These endeavours alone would provide many jobs on our island; possibly rivaling the forecasted numbers of the port.</p>
<p>We live in an economically depressed region, and to rally against the construction of the container port and the employment it will provide, without providing alternatives, would be wrong in my point of view. However, to not consider more sustainable alternatives, and put some time and effort into finding more sustainable solutions for our island’s future, could be a very expensive, highly-visible, long-lasting mistake. There are no guarantees with this venture, and it’s a lot of eggs to put in one basket. </p>
<p>The construction of a new container port, and ports in general, signifies an increase in global trade. This is a step backwards in our fight to protect the environment and pass on a hospitable planet to future generations. We have been polluting our water and air, degrading our soil, and creating mountains of waste for much too long. If we were to take stock of our available resources and divide them equally between all people on this planet, we would find that we are living far beyond our means. Our unsustainable western consumer culture comes at the expense of other populations and the planet we live on. It is the driving force behind many violent atrocities and recent environmental catastrophes in the world. We have been bombarded with media for generations that tells us we need to have and to own more and more. We have been taught in schools and our communities for decades that whoever has the most wins. Both not true.</p>
<p>We actually need very little, and many of the happiest cultures around the world are testament to this. We need food, clothing, shelter, and community; all of which we can provide sustainably. We must learn to live with less. Resources are finite and we are already at the breaking point. As developing nations grow and increasingly transition toward western values, things will get worse. We run the risk of running out of food and water in our quest to obtain material wealth. Capitalism has its limits and we are approaching them fast.</p>
<p>If we have exhausted all alternatives to a container port and reached the end of the debate, I would urge the community to step up and get involved. No one but ourselves will look out for our interests. The planning, construction, and operation, if left to outside organizations, will be driven by profit margins alone; environmental and social concerns will be met with the minimum adherence required. Why would we allow the corporate elite to get richer at the expense of our beautiful harbour and incredible island community. Now is the chance to take ownership, write the rulebook, and become the watchdog. An island of planners are better than a handful, and with careful thought, transparency, and eagerness to rise above the status quo, we should be able to design, build and operate the most sustainable port in the world. We have the opportunity to set a new standard and become a global example of commitment to excellence. Let us not judge our success by quarterly profits, but by our unwavering integrity and strength of community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Owns This Town? Responses to New Dawn&#8217;s Public Meeting by Alison Uhma</title>
		<link>http://miketargett.com/blog/who-owns-this-town-responses-to-new-dawns-public-meeting/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Uhma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketargett.com/?p=943#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Last night&#039;s Open Community Meeting on Port Development served well as both an informational session and an opportunity to rally around an identity of community. I admittedly find this issue confusing; in my previous reading and discussions with peers I found it hard to see past complex notions of “who is who?”, “who owns what?”, and “when did who own what?”. To spend an evening taking part in a discussion led by a host of esteemed community leaders focused on the why of community harbour ownership was inspiring. Community ownership is a viable and sure way to cement a future where allocation and distribution of gains are employed to best broaden and improve the future of Cape Breton. Cape Breton is a place that we can and should believe in; it is deserving of the optimism afforded last night. Though I proceed cautiously with the idea of immediate port promotion, I do not hold such wary sentiment in regard to community ownership. My hope is that the applause and united yeas of the people this evening will carry weight in New Dawn’s meeting with ECBC come Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night&#8217;s Open Community Meeting on Port Development served well as both an informational session and an opportunity to rally around an identity of community. I admittedly find this issue confusing; in my previous reading and discussions with peers I found it hard to see past complex notions of “who is who?”, “who owns what?”, and “when did who own what?”. To spend an evening taking part in a discussion led by a host of esteemed community leaders focused on the why of community harbour ownership was inspiring. Community ownership is a viable and sure way to cement a future where allocation and distribution of gains are employed to best broaden and improve the future of Cape Breton. Cape Breton is a place that we can and should believe in; it is deserving of the optimism afforded last night. Though I proceed cautiously with the idea of immediate port promotion, I do not hold such wary sentiment in regard to community ownership. My hope is that the applause and united yeas of the people this evening will carry weight in New Dawn’s meeting with ECBC come Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

