How I Met Your Mom: for Zadie, Shepard & Felix
Moore’s law predicts that the performance of microchips will increase exponentially over time. A variation seems to be governing the life-cycle of Atlantic Canada tech startups:
One of LeadSift’s angel investors is Jevon MacDonald, CEO of GoInstant. This is how it’s supposed to be. See the full story: natpo.st/UbigQl via @innovacorp
Is the rate at which Atlantic Canada startups are moving from innovation to acquisition accelerating? And if so, is it a bubble? Or a positive trend? ‘Entrevestor Intelligence’ thinks it’s just the beginning.
From Entrevestor Intelligence [pdf], sponsored by NSBI.
When co-browsing startup GoInstant sold out for more than $70 million this year, one detail that was lost in the hoopla was the fact that its technology was conceived and pioneered in Sydney, Cape Breton.
The company came together in late 2010 when Sydney-based programmers Gavin Uhma, Kirk MacPhee and David Kim showed up at one of the TecSocials organized by Robert Pelley, the Innovacorp Investment Manager based in Cape Breton.
The featured speaker that night was the agency’s Entrepreneur-in-Residence Jevon MacDonald, who was amazed when Uhma, MacPhee and Kim told him about the project they were working on – a co-browsing system that would allow people at different computers to work on the same screen…
The fact is that there is a community of tech talent in the former industrial hub that is exceeded in the province only by Halifax.MeConsider the case of eLearning company MediaSpark, which is developing GoVenture World, a massive multi-player online game that will train budding entrepreneurs in what it’s really like to start and grow your own business. The company has 17 employees, of whom 16 are in Sydney, including its entire development team.
As well as talent, Sydney-based companies have found capital needed for their businesses. Techlink Entertainment, which develops responsible gambling systems and products, has raised $5.5 million in VC investment and $6 million in loans from Nova Scotia Business Inc. World Health Outcomes and Marcato Digital Solutions have also raised VC funding, while MediaSpark received investment from what CEO Mathew Georghiou calls ‘quasi-venture capitalists’.
The tech community in industrial Cape Breton is as varied as you’d find in other centres, ranging from the healthcare systems developed by Corrine McIsaac at Health Outcomes Worldwide to the geological samples analysis software of Celtic Coring Systems.
One area of strength is developing technical applications for cultural industries – no doubt a happy byproduct of the rich artistic tradition of the area.
MediaSpark is a publisher of eBooks used around the world, while Marcato Digital has developed administrative systems for musicians and festivals. A newcomer to the space, TixCamp, is now developing software that can help concert organizers assess demand for specific acts.
“The biggest fallacy of writing on the web is the idea that there is unlimited space,” says GigaOM founder Om Malik on his blog. “The true limitation of the Internet is attention.”
And when all you have is a “minute and a half of someone’s attention,” it takes a great deal of creativity to make a persuasive argument, tell a compelling story, or deliver a factual news piece.
But the obverse is also true: in a world of 90-second attention spans, it takes an even greater deal of creativity to grab hold of that attention and not let go!
This is the philosophy of Atavist, a digital publishing app for long-form writing and multimedia storytelling. And its goal — a world where there’s space for attention.
Cofounder and CEO Evan Ratcliff recently spoke at XOXO, an arts and technology festival in Portland, Oregon. It’s not your average conference presentation. Instead he employs a narrative style that evokes — and references — the very kinds of storytelling you find on Atavist.
It includes surveillance footage of a $150 million helicopter-assisted heist of a vault in Sweden; a 7-year old’s diary of her troubled childhood; Brian Wilson’s original recordings from the making of Smile; a graphic novel chronicling a young boy’s escape from slavery in Ethiopia to a job as a retail clerk in Long Island, New York; and the time Ratcliff tried to vanish, like people who fake their own death.
When Ratcliff gives presentations about Atavist at publishing conferences, the reaction is often cynical.
“The publishing industry assumes that there’s a relationship between size and editorial control; that in order to do things that are high quality, that involve great writers, you need editors, and to have editors you need a huge building on Park Avenue that has twenty floors.”
Maybe the biggest fallacy of writing not on the web is that there is a direct correlation between overhead and quality.
New grant program, “Nova Scotia Moves”, supports community-led sustainable transportation initiatives. I’ll be applying to this grant for “Open Streets”.
…transforming downtown Sydney into a pedestrian-friendly centre of activity — by diverting motorized vehicles from Charlotte Street, and opening it up for people to walk, roll, stroll, play, shop and eat… Read more→
Interested in helping? Get in touch: email@example.com
It’s ironic that today I remember my Papa for something he wanted to forget.
Every year around this time, until his death in 2006, he used to make his way down to the Pier legion for the ceremonies. But at home he almost never talked about the war. Except to say “there were things I don’t want to remember.”
He thought war was a racket — a way to keep the economy going. If he’d lived a few more years, he’d have predicted that the only way out of the global economic crisis was war. Then he would have added: “Mark my words.”
His medals weren’t hidden away, but they weren’t on display either.
Much of Papa’s time was spent in Italy. My dad remembers him talking once about moving through Italy until things were secure. Then his company got a leave and they all went to Rome and saw Pius XII. When my dad first met a pope, and then when I did (John Paul II on a trip to Rome when I was 11), Papa reminded us that he’d beaten us to it.
His army buddies threw him into a huge water cistern once. He almost drowned. They thought he could swim because he was from Cape Breton and lived near the ocean.
He did talk a little about the challenges of feeding so many troops. And, although he never had a driver’s licence at home, about the trucks in Italy and the difficulty of keeping them going under such circumstances.
On more than one occasion (usually very late, after he’d had a couple), he’d reminisce about good times in an Italian village that had been liberated. About local people feeding troops at their homes. About parties in town squares.
Then he’d remember one of his friends, who didn’t come home, and he’d drift off.
Lest he remember. Lest we forget.
Remembrance Day, November 11th, 2012.
Democracy Now, Twitter, Al Jazeera English, NPR, red wine
My wife, Ardelle, and I have been watching US presidential debates and election together since 2004. It’s the ‘date night’ equivalent of a leap-year birthday.
Alex Sheppard is my wife’s 18 year old cousin. He’s currently attending Dalhousie.
Here’s the introductory remarks I wrote for his “Ideas Powered By Passion” talk:
Alex’s volunteer work — with Junior Achievement, all-ages shows, and most recently Lumiere — is a testament to the saying: “Do what you love, and try to find ways to make it matter more.” When Alex started playing in bands — often as the only under-age bass player in a band full of 19+’s — he needed adult accompaniment when playing at Bunkers. Rather than accept this as an inconvenience, or even allow it to become an impediment, he saw it as an injustice that there weren’t more all-ages venues and all-ages shows. So he started organizing some, combining his passion for the arts with the guts to take a risk. Rather than complaining about the youth out-migration problem — or simply saying “This town sucks” and moving on — he looks for ways to make music matter more, treating music and the arts in general as a downtown revitalization effort, a community development initiative, and a youth retention and attraction strategy.
In his talk, Alex identifies a tension in the life of Cape Breton youth — one which has far-reaching implications for both youth “retention” & outmigration, as well as immigration in general. Young people are brought up believing their only hope is to leave… but when they do leave (even if only to attend university elsewhere) they’re characterized as traitors. What a conflict! (“Should I stay or should I go?“)
Young people should be encouraged to pursue their dreams, wherever in the world those dreams take them. And they should be encouraged to return, with their degrees, their experiences, their expectations, and their entitlements.
We have a responsibility and obligation to make it a viable place to live, work, raise a family, and retire. So that when faced with the decision of where to set down roots, that Cape Breton is on the list.
Blue moon: your own twin?
Ask the sea: the tide answers,
Mike: for district 5
This is an edited version of a guest lecture given to Tracey Harris-Smith’s “Culture, Technology, and the Environment” class at CBU.
Here’s how Tracey pitched this lecture to me: “Mike, my class has spent the semester reading about industrial agriculture, production, consumption/consumerism, and they’re feeling pretty overwhelmed and depressed, can you come in and try to lift their spirits, maybe speak to the idea of the ‘personal is political’ or something.”
I took a look at your syllabus, and you’re all probably feeling like Kurt Vonnegut, who said about the world, “I’m sorry. It’s over. The game is lost.” This is quite a task.
I had planned to come in here today and get straight to the ‘lifting your spirits’ part, but it occurred to me that if you’ve been paying attention in class, your reaction will be along the lines of “yeah yeah but the game is lost.”
So instead I’m going to spend some time reflecting on that sentiment — that the game is lost. But I’ll ask you to bare with me, because you might find yourself thinking ‘This guy’s here to lift my spirits? Geez I’d hate to see him try to bum me out.’ I promise, it gets better at the end.
So is Vonnegut right? When it comes to the environment — the world — is the game lost? Consider what it would take to undo the damage done to the environment and society from two and a half centuries of mass production and consumption since the industrial revolution: over 200 years of industrial-strength pollution; 60 years of industrial-speed sprawl, consuming half of the world’s conventional recoverable oil supplies; and 35 years of hyper-growth fuelled primarily by debt.
The result is a triple-threat of global warming/climate change; peak oil; and global economic instability.
You’re probably right to feel overwhelmed! Especially when you look around and see governments, businesses, and institutions carrying on as usual. The only time they even talk about the environment is to call environmentalists “radicals”.
But what’s so radical about wanting to protect life-sustaining biosystems? About wanting to only consume as much energy and resources as is sustainable? And about wanting to build an economic system that is equitable?
And ‘equitable’ means equitable for all, including future generations.
This is important to emphasize. We, and our children, are going to pay the debt incurred by our parents and grandparents. And those living in less affluent regions of the world are going to suffer even more, as they pay the climate debt incurred by Western countries over the last several hundred years.
There’s a profound social justice element to environmental issues. In the case of climate change, those that haven’t benefited from the industrial revolution’s two centuries of ‘growth’ — and who therefore lack our financial means, our infrastructure, and our ability to respond to disaster — are the ones that will be hit first and hardest by the effects of climate change (rising sea levels, extreme weather events, flooding on the one hand, desertification on the other, dying fish stocks from ocean acidification, etc).
Food. Energy. Life-supporting environmental systems.
We’re talking about civilization itself. Far from radical, it seems to me perfectly reasonable to be concerned about this. It seems downright bizarre to not be concerned about it.
And because of the triple threat, not only is climate change a problem in addition to peak oil and economic instability, and not only do they exacerbate one another, but they are interconnected in ways that make it impossible to solve one without addressing the others.
For example, conventional oil has peaked (we’ll need some hindsight to know for sure exactly when). But generally speaking, until now, conventional oil production has been speeding up, and from now on, it will be slowing down. This means rising energy prices for us, consumers.
Will profits be invested in alternatives? Not enough. Instead, we’ll likely see increased investment in unconventional oil like the tar sands and a return to coal (which we never left). Meaning that right when we’re starting to feel the first effects of climate change from global warming, we’re also ramping up production and consumption of less efficient, more expensive, and highly polluting energy sources, which will increase global warming and worsen climate change.
And to complete the trinity, all this is taking place in an economic climate of fear and uncertainty. In the midst of a pathetic “Jobless Recovery”, the rhetoric of “Jobs Now!” will continue to trump all else. We’ll continue to under-invest in clean tech, meaning we won’t see the kind of technological innovation that would lead to a ‘green collar’ economy, let alone the kind of economic innovation that would lead to prosperity without growth.
I had to decline another invitation this morning to join a panel on CBC Information Morning with Steve Sutherland to discuss the federal budget released yesterday. Here’s what I would have said:
We have a Conservative government pursuing conventional austerity measures — shrinking government and cutting social programs, ultimately making life harder for ordinary people — in order to reduce the debt that they themselves created by cutting taxes and giving corporations more power, including more power to pollute. Instead, we need a stimulus package to invest in ‘green-collar’ jobs — like designing, building, installing and maintaining renewable energy systems — in order to reduce energy costs associated with peak oil, reduce global warming and avert the worst effects of climate change, and create sustainable and meaningful jobs that are good for our communities and our economies.”
Granted, that’s a sound byte, something a left-wing radical environmentalist might say. But what it basically boils down to is that life is going to be worse for us than it was for our parents, and we can expect our government to not care.
One of the simplest things you can do is get involved in an online organizing and activism effort. Engagement with these types of campaigns is often dismissed as “slacktivism”, because it doesn’t require much effort — a click here, a click there. But don’t be fooled. It takes less effort to vote, and no one’s dismissing that type of civic engagement as pointless… only people who would rather you did nothing!
One of the most impressive and inspiring is 350.org, the environmental movement started by Bill McKibben. The name refers to the level of carbon dioxide in parts per million that scientists say is a safe threshold, over which things start to get dicey, you start to see feedback loops, and climate change becomes a runaway train.
(For example, if global temperature rises 2 degrees celsius above normal, it melts permafrost. Permafrost stores massive amounts of methane, which is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Which would therefore increase the amount of heat-trapping gasses in the atmosphere. Which would worsen global warming. Which would — you guessed it — melt more permafrost. Feedback loops like this are hard if not impossible to halt.)
So let’s say you join with this global movement that is mobilizing around the idea that we need to keep carbon emissions below this threshold (we’re actually already at 385 or even 400, but scientists are always moving the threshold, so it is another instance where we won’t know until it is too late).
Two years ago we held a rally as part of a global day of action: thousands of people in almost every country in the world, all sending a message to the politicians meeting that month in Copenhagen. 70 people came out, wearing their parkas in sub-zero weather and blowing snow. (I joked in my opening remarks that it would have been a tragic irony if we had cancelled due to extreme weather.)
We talked about the effect of climate change on global citizens, Canadian citizens, and Cape Breton citizens.
I know some people went home feeling empowered. But others left feeling hopeless. After all, what impact does standing around in the cold have on global carbon emissions? And the answer is… none really.
But that’s not the point. The point is solidarity and engagement with the issue. That doesn’t begin at 6pm and end at 6:30pm on the same night. The point is to take the conversation that is happening globally and find a way to plant it locally. Climate change is a good starting point for the conversation, because it is a global issue. But it is not the only environmental disaster unfolding in slow motion all around us. It is a token, though, because climate change is connected to pretty much every other environmental, social, cultural, and economic issue you can think of.
After the 350.org event, I was invited by New Dawn, a community development and social enterprise organization based locally here in Sydney, to give a talk as part of thee IDEAS Powered by Passion series. In my talk I spoke about the changing context of the world and what it means for our community.
Essentially I asked: If Vonnegut is right, now what?
Kurt Vonnegut shot himself in the head. I don’t recommend that. What I do recommend is that we instead say, not that the game is lost, but that the game is changed. Probably radically altered even. And it is this new game that we need to win now.
What we are faced with is a world that is different — literally chemically different — than the one our parents lived in, and to an extent that can’t be undone. So the game — the new question — becomes this:
Are our communities resilient enough to withstand this change (and ongoing changes)?
And are they adaptive enough to be able to themselves change with those new conditions?
When the pressure is applied, will our communities break? How can we make our communities adapt by becoming new communities for a new world?
We can’t rely — at least not exclusively — on the federal government, and even to an extent provincial governments, to help us through this transition, because they are highly bureaucratized, rigid, monolithic things. They move at a glacial pace. (This is an ironic statement: actual glaciers are now changing — melting — faster and faster.)
These institutions, some of which are hundreds of years old and haven’t changed much if at all in that time, are too rigid to bend and so they might break; too slow to adapt and so they might die.
I’m using a little hyperbole here, but this evolutionary metaphor is accurate: think not only of government, but, as Margie Gillis puts it in the above clip, think of the Catholic church, think of universities, hospitals, even capitalism itself. Institutions — or organizing frameworks — that have managed to survive for quite a long time, sometimes by changing slowly and slightly with the times. But institutions that might actually, finally, be bumping up against the limits of their ability to change.
Certainly bumping up against their ability to provide a sufficient quality of life for most people. And this includes capitalism, which is “bumping up”, to put it mildly, against the ecological limits of economic growth.
Last year New Dawn went one step further and asked me to join its board of directors. New Dawn was doing some soul-searching and found that it too, like every organization reaching middle age, risked becoming too rigid and ossified to deal with the changing context of this community, which it is New Dawn’s mandate to serve.
New Dawn’s mission/vision statement is to foster a culture of self-reliance in order to create a vibrant community. It has done this over the last 36-37 years by providing affordable housing, community-based health care, career training, and various other projects like Meals on Wheels.
Pictured above is the ‘life cycle’ curve, which is usually used to talk about commercial products, but it is just as useful for organizations and institutions:
Introduction = the ‘problem’ out of which the organization grows.
Growth = the successful application of the solution.
Maturity = the institutionalization of the solution/organization.
It’s here, approaching the cusp between ‘maturity’ and ‘decline’, that the organization risks losing sight of its origins (literally losing sight, if we imagine this curve on a 3-dimensional plane, like going ‘over the hill’).
And it’s here, approaching this cusp, that the organization must decide whether to reinvent itself, or else commit to the slow decline that is more or less inevitable in the transition from vital organization to irrelevant institution.
I don’t know where New Dawn is on this continuum exactly, but it’s nonetheless asking itself: “What does it mean to be a self-reliant people in a vibrant community in the 21st century?”
Well, here are just a few examples:
It’s a working prototype, located in Westmount, designed to grow produce year-round. It may be replicated in Canada’s North where a tomato costs $14 and has to be flown in by helicopter. The greenhouse is built from glass designed and produced by a Cape Breton innovation company called Advanced Glazing Ltd. It uses a synthetic honey-comb structure sandwiched between two panels, which lets light in and disperses it evenly, and traps heat inside at the same time, acting as high-grade insulation. Significantly less energy is required to heat the greenhouse, providing a healthy, affordable, local, safe, and secure source of food year-round.
This has meant, by and large, fighting for what’s often referred to as the “community option” for port development.
A century ago, an industrialist king owned the means of production, owned the company store, owned the company houses. The king extracted natural resources from the community and extracted labour resources from the community, and ultimately made off with the wealth of the community, leaving a depleted economy and a toxic legacy.
Let’s not go down that road with the port.
1965. (Today is the beginning of the closure of the container terminal.)
— Mike Targett (@miketargett) December 11, 2010
Instead, the community should own the key assets (the greenfield site and the harbour bottom) and lease it for development. Then, whatever the development turns out to be, will produce royalties that can be streamed into a community equity fund, turning some of the profit from port development into direct investment in local businesses, education, health, and community development.
This will diversify the local economy, and avoid — you guessed it — setting up another house of cards economy that will come crashing down in 50, 25, or even 10 years.
With or without port development, New Dawn is pursuing a community equity fund. New Dawn runs a CEDIF, a Community Economic Development Investment Fund, which is a provincial program that allows community organizations to raise funds, mainly by having people redirect their RRSP investments.
New Dawn raised $1.5 million in February, which it loaned to Protocase, a local success story.
The CEDIF allows investors, who are people in the community, to direct investment in the community, rather than have government simply give tax breaks and other ‘incentives’ to multinational corporations, who create temporary jobs that dry up as soon as the subsidy ends or the company finds a better deal elsewhere.
I’ve spent 20 minutes talking about how screwed we are, and only a few minutes talking about community-based creative alternatives. That is in part because I do want to emphasize that many of these are only at the early stages of development, as are many of the exciting things happening in Cape Breton these days. They’re only just sprouting up, and others still are hidden from view.
But these sprouts — the initiatives, projects, and organizations creating a self-reliant people in a vibrant community for the 21st century — aren’t rigid, ossified, institutionalized. On the contrary, many are about trying to become resilient and adaptive in order just to make it in the new world I just described. But also in order to actively take part in its creation and betterment. If you want a sustainable job, look to those new initiatives, and others like them, and get involved on the ground level.
Last but not least is the early childhood development item I listed. This is something being pursued by Jim Mustard, a councillor in Inverness and son of the late Fraser Mustard, a world-leading expert on early childhood development.
Substance abuse, low levels of education and literacy, poor health, unemployment, crime. These and other indicators of community health — some of which are nearly epidemic in Cape Breton — are related to the care and level of provision a person has in childhood. The years between 0-5 are absolutely critical to brain development. A child that gets off to a slow start is at a disadvantage and may not be able to catch up. In Canada we do a pretty poor job at providing for people in the most formative portion of their life.
At New Dawn we’re just starting to have this conversation. What does it mean to really think about sustainability? In Inverness, Jim Mustard is in the process of co-developing a family support coop. In both cases, the goal is not to simply target low-income families or single mothers or at-risk people, but to provide universal provision; to come together as a community and support families.
You might be thinking, “But what does this have to do with the environment?”
I gave a talk two or three years ago, part of a panel discussion on the science, politics, and community responses to climate change. I talked about the community responses. At one point I showed this cartoon:
In other words, by working to “save” the world we would, almost by accident, create a better world.
But you know what the problem is with that argument? It’s that your vision of a better world might be a techno-futuristic one, where we still use as much energy as we want, we still consume as much as we want, we still drive as much and as far and as fast as we want, we still eat whatever we want and as much as we want.
We do whatever we want, but only by virtue of having invented some machines to save us from environmental collapse. Any number of the geo-engineering “solutions” being seriously considered in some quarters. Or maybe we’ll end up living under a glass dome, and eventually download our consciousnesses into cyberspace. Or whatever.
The point is, you can agree we need action on climate change. But the idea that we’ll do so by creating “livable communities” is controversial, given that our ideas of “livable” may diverge drastically.
Which means I need to defend the benefits of this vision of a livable community over that vision.
But that’s precisely where I’ll stop!
Such an argument would be a purely intellectual exercise, when what’s needed is experience. I can’t make the argument, only the world itself can make the argument. What do I mean? The way to make a better world, reduce global warming, lessen the impacts of climate change, make our communities more resilient and adaptive to the coming ‘storm’ (both literal and figurative), while retaining our basic humanity, is to…
Go for a walk.
I don’t mean ‘active transportation’ (which is great too). I mean that by living at a human scale, living at a human (and humane) speed — which is what happens when you go for a walk — whether in your own neighbourhood or far away, you get to know people, communities, cities. When you get to know some little piece of the world better, by extension you get to know The World better.
I have a feeling the more people get to know the world, the more they’ll find it perfectly reasonable to want to take better care of it.
“If we want to conserve energy and learn how to live on a sustainable scale, we should look to small towns and communities where low-growth or no-growth economies are supporting a high quality of life and housing treasuries of knowledge revealing what it means to have wealth without growth.”